Prince Andrew? Jeffrey Epstein? Alan Dershowitz? Bill Clinton? Kevin Spacey? Numerous other as-of-yet unnamed politicians, entertainers and wealthy businessmen? It does appear this story just won’t die, and in fact, it’s getting legs and those legs are getting stronger despite the behind-the-scenes machinations and manipulations to smother it. The problem for these Usual Suspects is the same problem confronting Bill Cosby — there are just too many Jane Doe’s to buy off or suicide off. Of course, there are some of you who are clueless to what I’m rambling on about, and that’s not an accident. This story is not getting coverage, or the coverage it deserves, in the mainstream press. Instead, you have to rely on intelligence rags like The Daily Mail and The National Enquirer to get a contained version of the story. If you recollect from my blog post entitled The Game, the intelligence community is adroit at hiding things in plain sight, and this story is no exception. By covering this story in less-than-credible publications, intelligence services discredits the veracity of it because those publications are not to be taken seriously. However, there are a few stories that will break free of the containment strategy, and hopefully this is one of them, because if these allegations have any merit, this is a Blockbuster. I don’t hold out hope, though, if only because a story like this is not exciting enough for the dull-witted. In an age of seen-it-all-and-done-it-all, the notion of elite-created child sex slave networks will hardly raise an eyebrow. That’s a sad and pathetic indictment, but it’s true. People are numbed. People are dumbed. People are inured. People are cured — of questioning. Mission Accomplished. Give them your children. And you do. And you will.
Here’s the story, or part of it at least, from The National Enquirer.
Published on: January 5, 2015
by Sharon Churcher
The British Monarchy is facing new humiliation as the fetish secrets of Prince Andrew are laid embarrassingly bare.
A beautiful blonde has told how she was “forced” to have sex with Prince Andrew by a sleazy New York financier who hired her as his teenage “sex slave.”
A Florida lawsuit this week named the woman “Jane Doe 3,” but The National ENQUIRER has identified the woman as Virginia Roberts.
In interviews with The ENQUIRER’s Investigative Editor Sharon Churcher, published here for the first time, Virginia claimed billionaire Jeffrey Epstein paid her after her trysts with Queen Elizabeth’s son.
“I was a pedophile’s top girl,” she said of Epstein, a registered sex offender.
“He was addicted to sex, and he started to ask me to ‘entertain’ his friends.
“He didn’t spell out what I had to do with them. He didn’t have to. He’d trained me up to do whatever a man wanted.”
Virginia claimed that in 2001, when she was 17, Epstein escorted her to the home of socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, where she was introduced to the heir to the throne.
“Ghislaine played one of her favorite guessing games,” Virginia recalled.
“She asked Andrew how old he thought I was. He guessed 17. They all kind of laughed about it and Ghislaine made a joke that I was getting ‘too old’ for Jeffrey.”
Later, she was driven to dinner and a club with him.
“He got me a cocktail from the bar and then asked me to dance,” she recounted.
“He was groping me. He touched my breasts. He touched my a**.
“He was not my type but I’d been trained not only to not show my emotions but to do what (was) wanted.
“After about an hour and a half, we drove to Ghislaine’s.”
They returned to Ghislaine’s home, where Queen Elizabeth’s second son undressed and got into a bathtub, she said.
“He started licking my toes, between my toes, the arches of my feet,” Virginia said.
“And we went into the bedroom and he proceeded to make love to me, so to speak. He wasn’t rude. It wasn’t like rape. But it wasn’t like love, either.
“It was more like, ‘I’m getting my business done.’ I’m pretty sure he didn’t use a condom. None of the men ever did.
“Jeffrey knew I was on the pill. In the morning, Ghislaine said, ‘You did well. He had fun.’”
Buckingham Palace has hotly denied the allegations.
“This relates to long-running and ongoing civil proceedings in the U.S. to which the Duke of York is not a party,” a royal spokesman said in a statement on Friday.
“As such we would not comment on the detail. However, for the avoidance of doubt, any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue.”
A source close to Andrew also said: “It is emphatically denied that The Duke of York had any form of sexual contact or relationship with Virginia Roberts.
“Any claim to the contrary is false and without foundation,” the insider added.
But according to Virginia, she was also summoned to Epstein’s Manhattan mansion in 2001 and told to escort Andrew to a dungeon-like room used for “erotic massages,” where they had sex on a massage table.
Her third and final sexual encounter with Andrew came during an orgy on a private Caribbean island, she said.
“Jeffrey directed us with hand gestures to start undressing and then we were instructed to start kissing and touching and to use (sex toys) on each other,” she recalled.
“Jeffrey and the Prince were laughing and then they stripped and I performed a sex act on Andrew.
“There was a dinner the next day and then Andrew was gone.”
Yes, I know, the article mentions nothing about Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz and Kevin Spacey. That’s how containment works. The article presents this as a quasi-isolated event/issue, and if you’re not inquisitive, and most people aren’t, you’ll just leave it at that and move on to the next gossipy story about the rich & famous. But I’m not like most people, so I’m researching it further. In my research I came across the following (not the YouTube — it’s context), and the fact that Dershowitz is going out of his way to discredit the Jane Doe’s leveling the accusations is telling, in my opinion. The more you look at this, and the closer you look at it, the deeper it goes. It reminds me of The Franklin Scandal. Patterns — they’re everywhere — if you care to look.
A New Yorker from humble beginnings, Jeffrey Epstein played on his blue-collar credentials and enormous wealth to extend tentacles of influence throughout America’s liberal political elite.
During the outcry over the Epstein case, it emerged that another man with a notorious appetite for young women, Bill Clinton, travelled with Epstein to a number of destinations, including three times on the billionaire’s private aircraft.
On one occasion, Epstein flew the former President, Hollywood actor and staunch Democrat Kevin Spacey and another actor friend of Mr Clinton’s, Chris Tucker, to Africa. Another time they went to Oslo, Moscow etc.
Virginia disclosed that Mr Clinton’s vice-president Al Gore and his wife, Tipper, were also guests of the pedophille macro Epstein on his island.
Another acquaintance was Israel defence secretary Ehud Barak, whose spokesman told The Mail on Sunday: ‘Mr Barak did attend several small functions in Mr Epstein’s home in New York that were usually attended by leading businessman, university presidents, Nobel Prize Laureates and prominent public figures.’
Epstein’s many Hollywood pals include Matt Groening, creator of The Simpsons.
According to former child sex slave Virginia Roberts and a class action lawsuit against convicted billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, former President Bill Clinton was present during sex parties involving up to twenty underage girls at Epstein’s secluded island in the Caribbean. That flight records show Clinton was flown on numerous occasions to the island on Epstein’s private jet. Clinton had a close relationship with an employee of Epstein’s who compiled thousands of photos of nude young girls posed in lewd positions. And these photos were used as a catalog for Epstein to loan out his girls to powerful politicians and British royalty, including Bill Clinton.
Claims: Virginia Roberts says she twice met ex-president Bill Clinton
According to the lawsuit:
…Clinton was friends with an unnamed woman who “kept images of naked underage children on her computer, helped to recruit underage children for Epstein… and photographed underage females in sexually explicit poses.
While Epstein was indicted and jailed for his pedophilia, Bill Clinton oddly has remained unscathed, more than likely by having friends in high places.
The Clinton’s war in behalf of the islamist Albanian mob 1999, vs. Serbia, helped establishment of the black hole of the European security. Kosovo has been the final destination for numerous kidanpped girls and boys for over a decade.
For example, in their three-month investigation, GlobalPost has uncovered mounting allegations that the highest levels of the U.S.-backed Kosovo government are involved in this human trafficking.
The victims of the trade are typically minor and teenage girls who are kidnapped, seduced and often forced into what amounts to sexual slavery. There is prostitution in Kosovo that services the international community, the U.S. and NATO military forces and the U.N. and aid workerts who operate here. But more frequently, investigators say, Kosovo is a trafficking hub for children and women sold into prostitution rings in the United Arab Emirates, Israel, Western European capitals and elsewhere. Much has been written about these victims, but less has been written about the men who carry out the trafficking.
Never too young for sex, according to the Albanian mentality
The United States and its NATO allies as well as the United Nations, have said publicly for some years that corrupt officials within Kosovo’s government and police have at times taken part in the illegal trade of girls and boys for sex.
According to Global post investigation, some senior political figures, specifically former KLA commanders, were indeed involved in the trafficking of women and little girls. Furthermore, GlobalPost has obtained several intelligence reports from NATO military and intelligence services that also claim senior former KLA commanders have been involved in the sex-slavery business. Further bolstering the claims, various well-informed people, including a former NATO intelligence official who worked in Kosovo and a Western diplomat with experience in the region, all say that it has been common knowledge in American, NATO and U.N. circles for years that the former KLA terrorists, commanders — many of them now in positions of great power in Kosovo — are believed to be linked to sex-trafficking and child prostitution.
After the occupation of the Serbian province the child prostitution, that has been an unknown phenomena, started to boost. A UN peacekeeper in Kosovo, who asked not to be named, spoke: “Often, even the Muslim girls are sold on by other brothel keepers. They are traded like cattle and are routinely beaten and drugged. If a girl tries to escape, she is raped or tortured — or told that her mother back home will be killed.”
Kosovo offer for tourists
For US $20 a child is left to a ‘client’ for 30 mins.
For US $2.50 client could buy a bottle of beer while he satisfied himself.
All the children receive are three poor meals a day, a dirty place to sleep on and the skimpy clothes their Albanian owner insists they must wear to attract clients.
Similar practice continued in Iraq. New disturbing charges have emerged against XE, the infamous private security firm formerly known as Blackwater Worldwide, whose operations came under spotlight after its 2007 carnage in Baghdad.
Blackwater founder, Eric Prince
According to a report by MSNBC and based on alleged sworn declarations by two Blackwater employees in federal court, the firm used child prostitutes at its compound in Baghdad’s fortified Green Zone.
The declarations added Iraqi minors got involve in sexual acts with Blackwater members in exchange for one dollar and Erik Prince, the firm’s owner, “failed to stop the ongoing use of prostitutes, including child prostitutes, by his men.”
As for the American presidents spreading (participating in?) pedophillia and democracy seems to be equal.
Still no mention of Dershowitz in either of the previous two articles. For that (mention of Dershowitz), I give you this from an interesting blog site called Mondoweiss. Pay close attention, because Dershowitz defended Epstein against the pedophilia charges and helped him obtain a highly controversial NPA (Non Prosecution Agreement) which was unequivocally irregular considering this case.
Philip Weiss on January 2, 2015
A federal lawsuit in Florida accuses Alan Dershowitz, the famed advocate for Israel, of sexually abusing a minor. Dershowitz has denied the charges and vowed to hit back.
The allegations come in a lawsuit by four women against the federal government for violating the rights of crime victims when it made a plea deal in 2008 with Jeffrey Epstein, the notorious financier, over allegations of sexual abuse of minors. Epstein ended up spending more than a year in prison.
The suit says that Dershowitz routinely had sexual relations with Epstein’s “sex slave” at a time when she was under 18 years old, and before she escaped Epstein. The JTA says that Dershowitz denies the charges:
Alan Dershowitz declared “totally, unequivocally and completely false” allegations that he enjoyed sexual services from a minor employed by a friend and client.
From the lawsuit. It states that Jane Doe #3 was held as a “sex slave” by Jeffrey Epstein between 1999 and 2002, when she was 15 to 18 years old. The sexual abuse took place in New York, Florida, Mexico, the US Virgin Islands, and on Epstein’s private planes. The allegation re Dershowitz:
Epstein also sexually trafficked the then-minor Jane Doe, making her available for sex to politically-connected and financially-powerful people. Epstein’s purposes in “lending” Jane Doe (along with other young girls) to such powerful people were to ingratiate himself with them for business, personal, political, and financial gain, as well as to obtain potential blackmail information. One such powerful individual that Epstein forced then-minor Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with was former Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, a close friend of Epstein’s and well-known criminal defense attorney. Epstein required Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with Dershowitz on numerous occasions while she was a minor, not only in Florida but also on private planes, in New York, New Mexico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. In addition to being a participant in the abuse of Jane Doe #3 and other minors, Deshowitz was an eye-witness to the sexual abuse of many other minors by Epstein and several of Epstein’s co-conspirators. Dershowitz would later play a significant role in negotiating the NPA on Epstein’s behalf. Indeed, Dershowitz helped negotiate an agreement that provided immunity from federal prosecution in the Southern District of Florida not only to Epstein, but also to “any potential co-conspirators of Epstein.” NPA at 5. Thus, Dershowitz helped negotiate an agreement with a provision that provided protection for himself against criminal prosecution in Florida for sexually abusing Jane Doe #3. Because this broad immunity would have been controversial if disclosed, Dershowitz (along with other members of Epstein’s defense team) and the Government tried to keep the immunity provision secret from all of Epstein’s victims and the general public, even though such secrecy violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act.
The story is getting headlines because Epstein also allegedly made the slave available to Britain’s Prince Andrew. The Washington Post quotes Dershowitz’s furious denials. Dershowitz told Politico he’s planning on filing some charges of his own in response to the allegations:
“[I’m] planning to file disbarment charges against the two lawyers who signed this petition without even checking the manifests of airplanes or travel itineraries, et cetera,” he said. “I’m also challenging the young woman and the lawyers to level those charges against me outside of the courtroom, so that I can sue them for defamation…..Finally, I’m challenging the woman to file criminal charges against me because the filing of false criminal charges is a crime.”
In a related filing, a lawyer whom Epstein is suing has said that Dershowitz and Epstein were friends for many years and “Epstein donated $30 Million one year to the university at which Dershowitz teaches.”
Here is a copy of the full court motion:
Make sure to read the comments to the linked article at Mondoweiss — they are very informative and in some cases clever and entertaining, but be warned, be sure to take your I ♥ Israel paraphernalia off before entering. Philip Weiss chose to highlight the Dershowitz angle of this unfolding story for strategic purposes, the least of which is his audience absolutely hates Dershowitz — they consider him an Israeli apologist and a Zionist scumbag. I don’t think they’re far off in their characterization of this publicity hound assclown (I don’t know what an assclown is but it sounds like a great slur, so I use it every now and then).
As I mentioned, the commentary at Mondoweiss, overall, has been excellent. I will quote a couple of comments below to underscore exactly what transpired in the Epstein case to keep this under wraps. Keep in mind, Dershowitz is defending much more than Epstein — he’s also defending himself as well as many other high profile individuals and the NPA, amongst other things, was intended to shield the facts of these charges from prying public eyes — what few there are (prying public eyes).
Brewer January 6, 2015, 2:24 am
Lawyers acting for Ms Roberts and three other women, who claim their right to be consulted on the non-prosecution deal was infringed by US prosecutors, believe that documentation exists to show that a number of public figures, including Prince Andrew and the former Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, lobbied on Epstein’s behalf during the case. Mr Dershowitz also strongly denies the claim.
But under an unpublicised ruling obtained by lawyers for Epstein, the details of the documents cannot be disclosed after it was argued that the negotiations over his plea deal were confidential and should not automatically enter the public domain.
Legal documents seen by The Independent said the material potentially includes “letters of recommendation or similar communication to any [US] government official vouching for or providing support for Jeffrey Epstein”.
In May last year, prosecutors surrendered 541 pages of correspondence with Epstein’s lawyers leading up to the 2008 non-prosecution agreement as part of an ongoing process by the alleged victims seeking access to almost 15,000 pages of documentation.
Instead, lawyers for the women must redact any references to the correspondence in their public filings after a judge ruled that Mr Epstein had “shown good cause to prevent potential dissemination… to the press for the purposes of generating publicity”.
The so-called protective confidentiality order was fiercely opposed by those representing Ms Roberts, now 31, who has three children and is living in America. They argued that it risked impeding public scrutiny of the Epstein case.
In a legal paper opposing the order, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, the lawyers for Ms Roberts, said: “There is an overriding interest in having these matters exposed to public light.
“There is considerable public interest in the question of how a serial child molester could arrange such a lenient plea agreement.”
link to independent.co.uk
” it was argued that the negotiations over his plea deal were confidential and should not automatically enter the public domain.”
I’d be interested in seeing the legal arguments for this extraordinary decision.
Also, don’t forget that when this anomalous NPA deal for an accused child molester was being crafted, it was George W. Bush’s Justice Department, which goes to show this type of sadistic and evil corruption transcends any fabricated political divides.
CloakAndDagger January 6, 2015, 12:04 am
Behind Epstein Suit, a Tussle Over Due Process and Victims’ Rights
The salacious allegations against Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz that surfaced in a federal lawsuit involving convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have generated international attention. Drawing less coverage is the lawsuit itself — a case with the potential to expand the rights of crime victims during federal investigations.
The law in question is the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, a statutory bill of rights for victims of federal crimes. Among other things, the law grants victims a “reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government in the case.”
The case exposes tensions between the due-process rights of the accused and the rights of victims.
Attorneys representing the plaintiffs, former federal judge Paul Cassell and Florida lawyer Bradley Edwards, say at stake “is whether a federal statute protecting crime victims rights can be ignored with impunity or, as we argue, whether instead real remedies exist for its violation.”
U.S. prosecutors say the government had no obligation to confer with the alleged victims. Since they never charged Mr. Epstein with a crime, they argue, the plaintiffs don’t qualify as victims under that 2004 law.
And even that right existed, the government argues, the Constitution’s due-process guarantees bar prosecutors from reneging on their agreement with Mr. Epstein.
In making their argument, prosecutors have cited a Dec. 2010 opinion issued by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, which provides legal advice to the president and executive-branch agencies. The opinion states that the “rights provided by the CVRA are guaranteed” only after “criminal proceedings are initiated through a complaint, information, or indictment.”
In a 2011 ruling, the federal judge presiding over the case, Kenneth A. Marra, sided with the plaintiffs’ interpretation of the law, writing that the CVRA “clearly contemplates pre-charge proceedings.”
And in a 2013 order, rejecting a motion by the government to dismiss the case, the judge wrote that a non-prosecution arrangement may be “re-opened” if it were reached in “violation of a prosecutor’s conferral obligations under the statute.”
The plaintiffs’ lawyers allege that the government failed to meet those obligations. In court documents, they accuses the U.S. attorney’s office of concealing the agreement “to avoid a firestorm of public controversy that would have erupted if the sweetheart plea deal with a politically-connected billionaire had been revealed.”
There is much more to this case besides the scandal. This is not going to go away easily.
Denis January 3, 2015, 12:26 pm
You’re right W.Jones, it’s weird. And it’s weirder if you dig down deeper than the MSM and BS have done so far.
Court documents show that Bruce Reinhart was an atty in the US Attorney’s Office in the South FL district when Epstein was being investigated by the FBI. The US attorneys offered Epstein a “non-prosecution agreement” (NPA), which is rare. USAO agreed to drop the investigation of Epstein and “co-conspirators” if Epstein pled to minor state charges.
IOW, this was not a “plea bargain” because there were never even any federal charges. And that is what has everyone scratching their heads — the FBI had good stuff on this pedophile and his “friends” for up to 40 charges of kiddie-sex and producing kiddie porn, why did they give Epstein an NPA and let them all go????
IMO when a DA does something procedurally crazy that benefits the perp and the perp is filthy rich, check the DA’s bank account.
Funny thing about that: Reinhart was a US attorney involved in the Epstein case until he quit in 2008. Epstein’s NPA deal went down in June, 2008.
According to Exhibit “C” in one of these cases (Epstein v. Rothstein et al) Reinhart left the USOA’s office and was hired by Epstein to represent Epstein’s people. For instance, Reinhart represented Epstein’s young “assistant” Sarah Kellen in a deposition.
Reinhart also tried to intervene in the current Crime Victims’ Rights Act case to set aside the sickening NPA deal given to Epstein. It is amazing to me that Reinhart is permitted to touch this case in any capacity.
The other interesting but unspoken thing in this case is the “lop-sided demographics”. The case has been, basically, the Jane Does’ lawyer Brad Edwards pitted against Epstein, Dershowitz, Reinhart, Rothstein, Weinberg. Etc. Foxman undoubtedly sees Edwards as antisemitic. I don’t think so. Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew are swimming in this mess somewhere, and they ain’t Jewish.
Jane Doe #3, Virginia Roberts, who is pushing this thing is now married w/ 3 kids and living in Australia. She’s a brave, and now undoubtedly wealthy, lady. But I don’t see a further payout for her in this action. The suit is against the USG to reopen the criminal charges, not against Epstein.
The worrying thing to me is that JD#3 claims she was provided to a famous prime minister while she was a minor. Hmmm …. Barak (and I ain’t talkin’ Obama) was PM during this time, and he was a good friend of Epstein. Probably just a coincidence, eh? Tony Blair was on Epstein’s buddy-list, too. Who knows? But one way or the other this thing is going to be huge unless these people can be shut up.
Here’s a link to Exhibit “C” — it includes the original Dershowitz claims and a lot more.
Lock up your libraries if you like; but there is no gate, no lock, no bolt that you can set upon the freedom of my mind. ~ Virginia Woolf
Someone has to die in order that the rest of us should value
life more. ~ Virginia Woolf
We are nauseated by the sight of trivial personalities decomposing in the eternity of print. ~ Virginia Woolf
Molasses isn’t molasses unless it’s blackstrap — whatever
blackstrap is. ~ Cold N. Holefield
I thought the Kevin Spacey connection was interesting, telling and ironic considering his role as the lecherous Lester Burnham in the movie American Beauty. As a side note, I have a couple of male military relatives who refuse to believe Colonel Fitts, Lester’s new next door neighbor and the person who ultimately murdered Lester, is a repressed homosexual. Yet another example of things that make you think “hmmmmm.” Anyway, here’s Lester The Molester thunderstruck by his daughter’s sixteen-year-old friend. I wonder if Alan, Jeffrey, Andrew and Bill are big fans of American Beauty? I bet they are and were pissed when Lester didn’t go all the way.